Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11762 14
Original file (NR11762 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HCG
Docket No. NR11762-14
4 May 15

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Te: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref: (a}; ‘Title 10 U.sS.c., 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) HQOMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dtd 14 Apr 15
(3) Subject'’s naval record

 

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to authorize consideration for remedial promotion.

2. The Board, consisting of iy fo cg

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 April
2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective

action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective

action.
Docket No, NR11762-14
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. Petitioner is authorized remedial consideration for the
FY 2008 Staff Sergeant Selection Board. If Petitioner is not selected
for promotion, Petitioner is to be considered for the FY 2009 and FY
2010 Staff Sergeant Selection Boards, respectively, if needed.

a”

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of

 

Si. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.
4 May 15

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7775 13

    Original file (NR7775 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was then selected by the FY 2012 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board, convened on 17 April 2012, and he was promoted to gunnery sergeant with a date of rank and effective date of 1 December 2012. d. Enclosure (4) shows that the in zone percentage selected for the FY 2006 Staff Sergeant Selection Board was 62.2. e. Enclosure (5) reflects that the HQMC Performance Evaluation Review Board directed removing Petitioner's fitness report for 1 April to 2 November 2006, which documented the later...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10290-08

    Original file (10290-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The front page of his fitness report for 18 March to 25 July 2008, a copy of which is at Tab B, verifies he had a first class PFT score of 205. d. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps Enlisted Promotion Section commented to the effect Petitioner’s request should be denied, as he “chose not to take his PFT making him unqualified for extension or reenlistment.” e. Enclosure (3) is Petitioner’s reply to enclosure (2), detailing the circumstances that prevented him from taking...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06522-99

    Original file (06522-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) DD Form 149 w/attachments Ltr of 22 Jul 97 to President of FY 97 Staff Sergeant Promotion Board Request of 20 Jan 98 to expunge fitness report CMC ltr of 3 Apr 98 approving the removal of fitness report Request to extend on active duty for remedial promotion consideration and denial Ltr of Apr 98 requesting remedial promotion consideration and denial CMC MMPR-2 memo of 10 Jan 00 Microfiche Records Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), subject, that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00413-09

    Original file (00413-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Copies of the ‘PERB memorandum directing that action and the two removed reports are at enclosure (2). He was selected by the FY 2008 Staff Sergeant Selection Board, the first board to consider him without the contested fitness reports, and promoted with a date of rank and effective date of 1 October 2008. d. In the advisory opinions at enclosure (3), MMPR-2, the HOMC Enlisted Promotion Section, recommends that relief be denied, as Petitioner did not exercise due diligence, and even his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00666-01

    Original file (00666-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD:hd Docket No: 00666-01 15 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LCDR Sq iiaiiiiiinibee ssc, US REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07857-02

    Original file (07857-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 dtd 27 Aug 02 PERS-80 memo dtd 5 Sep 02 Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing his ensign date of rank to 22 August 1998, his lieutenant junior grade date of rank and effective date to 22 August 2000, and his lieutenant date of rank and effective date to 1...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08256-00

    Original file (08256-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank and effective date in the grade of captain she would have been assigned had she been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 00 Staff Captain Selection Board, vice the FY 01 Staff Captain Selection Board. The Board, consisting of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Jan 26 14_11_29 CST 2001

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD:hd Docket No: 04702-98 19 October 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ~ REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03147-11

    Original file (03147-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner further requested removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 19 March 2008, a copy of which is at Tab F. Finally, he requested setting aside the Commandant Of the Marine Corps (CMC)'s revocation dated 8 July 2008 of his selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 First Sergeant Selection Board and promoting him to first sergeant with the lineal precedence he would have had, but for the revocation. The PERB report at enclosure (2) stated that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02022-02

    Original file (02022-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 dtd 16 Jan 02 w/attachments PERS-80 memo dtd 23 Apr 02 Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant he would have been assigned had he been promoted to that grade pursuant to his selection by...